City Feet message board


Pages: (134) « First ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... Last » ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> BAREFOOT URBAN GIRLS / barefoot-urban-girls.com, Weekly PHOTO-VIDEO UPDATES thread
NFH
Posted: Jun 22 2015, 08:25 PM
Quote Post


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 79
Member No.: 1763
Joined: 25-February 10



------------------------
PMEmail Poster
Top
Feetosopher
  Posted: Jun 23 2015, 10:49 AM
Quote Post


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4600
Member No.: 2618
Joined: 22-July 12



QUOTE (NFH @ Jun 22 2015, 08:25 PM)
I don't know all the girls you made shoots with (the nudity is a great bonus, nevertheless, it doesn't do it extremely to me as much as it used to when I was younger, casual simple barefoot and/or bare-bellied especially if pregnant, are my greatest passions these days), I am attracted though by the lovely face or Mary, and by mesmerizing smile of Irie that makes me melt before even looking at her feet and soles.

About Alexis, from a quick dig, l found the old preview photos back in 2004 along with Shiva.

I have a weaker spot towards mature ladies, not so sure if due to her pregnancy in 2006 that I adored her more, or due to growing beautifully, well, we cannot wait to see if her cute daughter would indeed turn-out to be in 2024-2025 a future barefoot urban girls star, especially if she would be also expecting.

No idea if and when I would join your site, the barefoot & pregnant Alexis (hopefully other mothers too) would be one of the main reasons, even if for a short while.

I had tons of issues with CCBill, in tons of sites in the past, each time I click "enter" or "submit order" or so, even if supposedly Lebanon is in the countries list, I kept being asked for my bank's name and its customers' service number, but nothing used to happen when I give them these additional info.
Last year, no clue if CCBill changed their rules, I got a 3 days membership with an Italian site, I was surprised I was able too even if they used CCBill.
If it works with BHE sites, cool, I hope so, fingers (and toes) crossed.

But even if they only had a 6 MP camera in their old sets, they only posted about 1 MP or so pix in their site, now they got a 20 MP camera, but only offer 6 MP pix.
It is a pity, yeah they want to save server space, but just like my complaint in Southern-Charms, for a paid membership, they should offer the best they can make.
For people not wanting the hugest possible, giving them the choice between that and half of it at min., would be neat.

About you, your old "Minolta DiMAGE A1" was a 5 MP cam, and your current "Nikon D5100" is a 16.2 MP camera, nevertheless, the preview pix are about 1 MP to less than 3 MP.
Is this only for the free photos, but we would get the ultimate in the membership?
If you cannot offer the 5 MP and 16.2 MP in BHE, may we ask for specific sets to be uploaded temporarily elsewhere?
Are your clips (at least the new ones) in Full HD?

Thank you for your interest in BAREFOOT URBAN GIRLS.
I go straight to the points you raised:
1) All sites hosted by BHE do not use CCBill.. they use BHE's own proprietary system BHE-Bill. Frankly speaking I have no idea if they can deal with Lebanon-based customers without the annoyance you have experienced. You can probably guess that Lebanon is not the market with the greatest potential on the planet for adult entertainment.
2) I have my own approach to picture quality. I have always preferred not-so-huge pics (even if mine are bigger in size than those of the main competitors), but with a resolution as sharp as a razor. This is the reason why I start from 4,928x3,264 px (JPEG format) originals to obtain 1,800xX,XXX pics, which is the format available to subscribers: to have extremely sharp resolution.
3) I adopt the same approach for videos: I hate large size videos which look hazy and blurred. In this case, you also have to take into account that most potential customers have connections which do not allow to download videos which are in the 1-1,5GB range, like my originals (1,980x1,080px / 30fps / bit rate in the 10-18Mbps range). So I edit originals to offer to my subscribers 720x400px vids, which I consider a reasonable compromise between clarity and download speed.
4) A one-month non-recurring membership to BAREFOOT URBAN GIRLS costs just 14,95USD.. i.e. a lunch at a cheap restaurant. I don't think this is a huge sum, especially if this allows you to enjoy over 6,000 pics and hours of video footage.
Kindest regards.


--------------------
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
NFH
Posted: Jun 23 2015, 09:10 PM
Quote Post


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 79
Member No.: 1763
Joined: 25-February 10



-------------------
PMEmail Poster
Top
Feetosopher
  Posted: Jun 24 2015, 07:02 PM
Quote Post


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4600
Member No.: 2618
Joined: 22-July 12



Dear friends.. I am ultra-happy to announce that this week's update at BAREFOOT URBAN GIRLS will feature PICS and a VIDEO from the FIRST BIKINI SHOOTING in the history of the site!
Can you guess the name of this gorgeous, HARD&DUSTY-SOLED bikini beauty? smile.gif
BAREFOOT URBAN GIRLS PHOTOSETS
BAREFOOT URBAN GIRLS VIDEOCLIPS
ENJOY! cool.gif

user posted image

user posted image


--------------------
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Feetosopher
  Posted: Jun 27 2015, 01:55 PM
Quote Post


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4600
Member No.: 2618
Joined: 22-July 12



She is SWAINS, of course! smile.gif
In all her barefoot bikini glory.. and she even smiles (sometimes)! wink.gif
Check today's update at BAREFOOT URBAN GIRLS! cool.gif
BAREFOOT URBAN GIRLS PHOTOSETS
BAREFOOT URBAN GIRLS VIDEOCLIPS

user posted image


--------------------
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
michael0218
Posted: Jun 27 2015, 02:04 PM
Quote Post


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1369
Member No.: 2874
Joined: 15-June 13



Thought so...make it tougher next time Feetosopher!!


--------------------
Yana, Alyona and Alexandra (colorful dress) are perfection...the sexiest and the prettiest models.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Feetosopher
  Posted: Jun 27 2015, 02:04 PM
Quote Post


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4600
Member No.: 2618
Joined: 22-July 12



This week we are proud to dedicate our weekly update to an outstanding barefoot beauty, who entered the third year of activity as a model for BAREFOOT URBAN GIRLS..
please make a VERY LOW BOW to the wonderful SWAINS!
These pics were taken a few days ago on Garda Lake (Italy): SWAINS is the FIRST BAREFOOT URBAN GIRL EVER to wear a SUPER-HOT BIKINI for a shooting!
Super-glamorous poses and great close-ups of SWAINS' rough, calloused soles, with dirt ingrained in the skin! rolleyes.gif
With this week's update, we celebrate the ultra-deserved passage of SWAINS to "Barefoot Urban Star" status.. CONGRATULATIONS, SWAINS! smile.gif
BAREFOOT URBAN GIRLS PHOTOSETS
BAREFOOT URBAN GIRLS VIDEOCLIPS
ENJOY SWAINS! cool.gif

SWAINS - (hard-soled) feet size 37EU/6.5US, and a body to dream about! rolleyes.gif
user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

SWAINS in VIDEO!
user posted image

SWAINS is DRESSED TO KILL at Garda Lake (Italy)!
user posted image

SWAINS' high arches!
user posted image

SWAINS' perfect sexy booty.. in hot pants!
user posted image


--------------------
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
ft932
Posted: Jun 28 2015, 01:28 PM
Quote Post


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 7
Member No.: 2998
Joined: 30-September 13



QUOTE (Feetosopher @ Jun 23 2015, 10:49 AM)
3) I adopt the same approach for videos: I hate large size videos which look hazy and blurred. In this case, you also have to take into account that most potential customers have connections which do not allow to download videos which are in the 1-1,5GB range, like my originals (1,980x1,080px / 30fps / bit rate in the 10-18Mbps range). So I edit originals to offer to my subscribers 720x400px vids, which I consider a reasonable compromise between clarity and download speed.

It's 2015 now, not 2005. Even 1,980x1,080 is already outdated, time to move to 4K. But I rather prefer move to 3D. BluRay-3D full hd looks amazing. Sadly there is no tendency at all in that direction in theme.
PS. CityFeet started releasing their videos in 1080p in 2011. There are 3 or 4 different versions of each video for subscribers with poor connections. Difference in quality between 1080p and 720p is stunning. Imagine how cool 4K will look like. Or 1080p@3D even better.
PM
Top
Feetosopher
  Posted: Jun 28 2015, 02:57 PM
Quote Post


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4600
Member No.: 2618
Joined: 22-July 12



QUOTE (ft932 @ Jun 28 2015, 01:28 PM)
QUOTE (Feetosopher @ Jun 23 2015, 10:49 AM)
3) I adopt the same approach for videos: I hate large size videos which look hazy and blurred. In this case, you also have to take into account that most potential customers have connections which do not allow to download videos which are in the 1-1,5GB range, like my originals (1,980x1,080px / 30fps / bit rate in the 10-18Mbps range). So I edit originals to offer to my subscribers 720x400px vids, which I consider a reasonable compromise between clarity and download speed.

It's 2015 now, not 2005. Even 1,980x1,080 is already outdated, time to move to 4K. But I rather prefer move to 3D. BluRay-3D full hd looks amazing. Sadly there is no tendency at all in that direction in theme.
PS. CityFeet started releasing their videos in 1080p in 2011. There are 3 or 4 different versions of each video for subscribers with poor connections. Difference in quality between 1080p and 720p is stunning. Imagine how cool 4K will look like. Or 1080p@3D even better.

Great to see that you dedicated one of your 5 POSTS in the forum (since 2013.. WOW!) basically to throw shit at my videos, and (no surprise) to incensate the competing websites' videos.
BTW, I have my own theory about all these "dormant" profiles "resuscitating", or newbies making their debut on the forum just to attack me and to despise my work.. but I'll keep it for myself.

This said, BAREFOOT URBAN GIRLS is, and will remain in the future, mainly a picture-oriented site.
For a simple reason: it would be stupid to try to compete with City Feet and Toes-In-Action with a BHE-hosted "standard" website like mine, without a pay-per-download clip store, and with just a handful of videos (compared to the kazillion vids that my competitors are offering).
The fact that I have subscribers (more than you think, sir..) proves that there are people around who appreciate what I can offer for just 11,95USD.
Regards.


--------------------
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
ft932
Posted: Jun 28 2015, 04:15 PM
Quote Post


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 7
Member No.: 2998
Joined: 30-September 13



QUOTE (Feetosopher @ Jun 28 2015, 02:57 PM)
QUOTE (ft932 @ Jun 28 2015, 01:28 PM)
QUOTE (Feetosopher @ Jun 23 2015, 10:49 AM)
3) I adopt the same approach for videos: I hate large size videos which look hazy and blurred. In this case, you also have to take into account that most potential customers have connections which do not allow to download videos which are in the 1-1,5GB range, like my originals (1,980x1,080px / 30fps / bit rate in the 10-18Mbps range). So I edit originals to offer to my subscribers 720x400px vids, which I consider a reasonable compromise between clarity and download speed.

It's 2015 now, not 2005. Even 1,980x1,080 is already outdated, time to move to 4K. But I rather prefer move to 3D. BluRay-3D full hd looks amazing. Sadly there is no tendency at all in that direction in theme.
PS. CityFeet started releasing their videos in 1080p in 2011. There are 3 or 4 different versions of each video for subscribers with poor connections. Difference in quality between 1080p and 720p is stunning. Imagine how cool 4K will look like. Or 1080p@3D even better.

Great to see that you dedicated one of your 5 POSTS in the forum (since 2013.. WOW!) basically to throw shit at my videos, and (no surprise) to incensate the competing websites' videos.
BTW, I have my own theory about all these "dormant" profiles "resuscitating", or newbies making their debut on the forum just to attack me and to despise my work.. but I'll keep it for myself.

This said, BAREFOOT URBAN GIRLS is, and will remain in the future, mainly a picture-oriented site.
For a simple reason: it would be stupid to try to compete with City Feet and Toes-In-Action with a BHE-hosted "standard" website like mine, without a pay-per-download clip store, and with just a handful of videos (compared to the kazillion vids that my competitors are offering).
The fact that I have subscribers (more than you think, sir..) proves that there are people around who appreciate what I can offer for just 11,95USD.
Regards.

Feetsopher it is not shit throwing, its a sugestion for improvement. If you alerady shoot in high quality why not upload 2 versions of same clip? it will somehow affect the subscription price?
PM
Top
Feetosopher
  Posted: Jun 28 2015, 04:27 PM
Quote Post


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4600
Member No.: 2618
Joined: 22-July 12



QUOTE (ft932 @ Jun 28 2015, 04:15 PM)
Feetsopher it is not shit throwing, its a sugestion for improvement. If you alerady shoot in high quality why not upload 2 versions of same clip? it will somehow affect the subscription price?

Oho, much appreciated.. it deffo sounded like "your vids are shitty compared to CF ones".. dry.gif
This said, mine is a weekends-only, one-man operation: editing and uploading 1/1,5GB videos is a huge pain in the ass which would take hours: I'm not getting into such an operational nightmare to win.. HOW MANY ADDITIONAL SUBSCRIBERS (IF ANY)??? YOU???
Regards.


--------------------
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
ft932
Posted: Jun 28 2015, 04:53 PM
Quote Post


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 7
Member No.: 2998
Joined: 30-September 13



Editing, I didn't think of that... I am no expert in videoediting. As for an uploading it is only time. Push the upload button and do something else while it uploades...
PM
Top
Feetosopher
  Posted: Jun 28 2015, 05:18 PM
Quote Post


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4600
Member No.: 2618
Joined: 22-July 12



QUOTE (ft932 @ Jun 28 2015, 04:53 PM)
Editing, I didn't think of that... I am no expert in videoediting. As for an uploading it is only time. Push the upload button and do something else while it uploades...

Many thanks for your precious advice, sir.. I deffo needed a counsellor to learn to use my time in a more efficient way.. biggrin.gif


--------------------
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
shifter
Posted: Jun 28 2015, 08:21 PM
Quote Post


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1077
Member No.: 1877
Joined: 2-October 10



dear people, please dont forget, feetosophers sites are one-man operation

Some of you may remember, before his both sites even existed he was just sharing some free pictures on a couple of sites, like deviantart, but also had a contribution corner at hals toes-in-action website, so in other words, he had a huge archive a pictures, a private collection, but on the internet his pictures were very rare.

Then somewhere, i think it was also here in this forum there was a discussion if he should make a paysite or not, and lots of people here actually encouraged feetosopher to share his work with us through a paysite, it took quite a while since this finally become reality and now we have the chance for us for relativly less money to own a part of his work,

i dont think i´m the only one who is enjoying those or am i?

there is also the option to have no access to those excellent pictures at all, like it was in the past, which would be great loss in my opinion.

of course there are "technical standards" in 2015 but to fullfill all those, you either must be rich, or have already setup a well performing company that just do that and also aquire lots of money from their work.

but this is not reality for this kind of art, this is just a niche, and most likely feetosopher will never earn a couple of thousands dollars each month through this paysites, (unforuntatly), but i bet, if he would, he would be the first who would upgrade his camera.. how does a 100mp hasselblad sound? , some 4k videocameras and lighting speed webserves.. but at the current state.. this is just an utupia.
and i guess its not worth and doable at the moment to investing thousends of $$ in new equipemnt if the websites on the other end doesnt pay it back at a reasonable amount of time.

the only way to support him in his work is to join his paysites at the moment, if we do, it generates fund and he can re.invest it in models and gear

there is also the option to run a startup funding project, like many startups to. do we want to help him fund him his business?

@feetosopher
please keep up the good work, i´m really enjoying it and i hope this will continue for a long time
PMEmail Poster
Top
NFH
Posted: Jun 28 2015, 08:49 PM
Quote Post


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 79
Member No.: 1763
Joined: 25-February 10



-------------------------
PMEmail Poster
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic OptionsPages: (134) « First ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... Last » Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 



[ Script Execution time: 0.0172 ]   [ 11 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]