Let the guy post his or the pictures he finds around. I had many of mine pictures within his albums and I don't care at all. Im with DG, what is the deal with Stanley Not Kubrick? WTF...

He had a picture of my barefoot girlfriend's feet too, I think took from Facebook.

I'm with DG too (leaving apart any consideration about S.N.K, who's not an interesting subject to me at all, really ... I'm on this board to discuss BAREFOOTING).

I've recently posted a review of some Hal's videos, together with some pics .. I like thinking that he could have sold one extra copy, not one less, after my post.

I mean: pics of barefooters belong to ... "barefooting".
Obviously, with measure!, when they're from pay sites.
That's all, to me: anything more is somehow exaggeration.

The unique and only real tragedy, within this borders, would be something like Cecilia saying "folks, got hurt, too much pain, thought I was tougher instead my soles toughness betrayed me and abandoned me in front of a lot of people, feel shaken and weak and I must use shoes now, see you in some weeks, maybe". (Somehing similar happened to Polina, that luckily reacted very well.)

Can't see any other ... tragedy, here.

Buy the dude has posted paid-only photos before. And re-posted...

If there's no "tragedy" there, but perhaps Phil would like to expand his business by releasing his content for free.

Doesn't make much sense, does it? :<

This is obviously not fair.
I've to admit I don't rememember exactly that "situation".

Well, to his defense he's always taken them down. But he keeps on doing it. I recall a while back he posted some of Orobas' photos, and after some flickr drama he finally took them down.