only legal as long as no-one gets hurt. Minors need to be protected.

The only legal is enough.

I don't think there will be some hurt to the girl in the video, if members of this forum will watch her. Just dont post your video on youtube, if you don't want people see it.


Everyone wants to live in free country. Free country is the country where you can do absolutely ANY legal things without fear of being punished by the law. But, unfortunately, many countries (I don't want to name them) aren't as free as they claim. The result is I'm afraid to post link to the legal video clip.

Ok,only over 18,no problem.

I do not know how are the law in outher country,but I'm sure that this video in italy is
perfectly legal.

barefoot John : when you buy any normal magazine,view any spot or film with actors or photos
that clearly have subjects under 18 you think that are all illegal and to delete ?

I do not think so....

So if you do not want under 18 material I agree with you,but do not call illegal video like this

Paul did the right thing by removing the video. It may not have been illegal, but it was in poor taste to post it. With all of the beautiful barefoot women in the world 18+ y/o who the hell needs to risk the problems posting pictures of teenagers? Barefoot John, I agree with your position also.

Just because something is legal doesn't mean it's right or ok.

For example, if you work somewhere and the owner of your company decides he wants extra profit for himself and to earn it he fires you and several of your work mates.
Legally he is entitled to do that, it happens all the time.
Will you feel that it was the right thing to do?
Yes he acted within the law, what he did was legal he had the right to do it but was it right? He already has more money than he ever needs but he went and f#$ked you and your workmates to earn more.

My point is that yes Paul, society should be free, you should have the right to do what ever you please for sure but with rights come responsibilities. We have the responsibility to protect the vulnerable. Minors are vulnerable. I think it's irresponsible to post a clip made by teenagers on a fetish site when that was not what they intended.

And Clipper, again in a normal magazine the intent is not sexual. Just like youtube. The intent is not sexual, if people make it so there's nothing you can do about it. But a fetish site, the intent is sexual.
So yes you have pictures and stories about people under 18 in magazines all the time. Wouldn't it be wrong to have those pictures and stories in Hustler?

If that girl was your daughter would you be ok having her video here? I wouldn't.

John, I think there is nothing wromg when my chief fire me and several of my workmates, if he wants to do so. If he can earn more money without me than with my help, I deserve to be fired. That's a fact. The words about chief is not right smells like a socialist idea, I hate such ideas.

In my opinion, vulnerability of tinagers (if any) is just tinagers' problem, not mine or yours. My responsibility is to follow the law, that's all. If somebody wants to help tinagers, it's his right to help them. My right is to forget about all poor and cripple, and I want to use this right without fear of punishment. It's not right thing, when you are forced to do what you are not obliged to do. I don't want to remove the link, the link can be placed on this forum without any law violation. But I have to remove the link because there is a real threat of unfair actions against the domain, the hosting e.t.c. You know, such things are common last years. That sucks. I hate this. Of course, in case of judicial proceedings it will be stated that there are no law violation, but I have no time, no money and no possibility to defend my rights in the court. Such thing will ruin my business. I just want to follow the laws and consequently to be safe. Problems of tinagers don't matter for me when I don't violate their legal rights.

By the way, I don't see something wrong if somebody will see legal photos of my daughter in sexual context. Everybody can dream what he wants, this is primary human right. Well, I don't have a daughter, I have son, but that doesn't matter It's illegal to place photos on my daughter anywhere without my permission. But it's completely legal and ok to place link to the photo in any place.

Shoul I ask every girl at the street is she 18+ before I become aroused?

For Paul : I have deleted my traslation,so there is no more about this video.

For barefoot John : sorry but you are wrong.

1 - Fetish IS NOT sexual intent ! Are two completely different things !
And are placed in completely different web site.

2 - Remember that this video link is here because people like me and you like this type of site
content (THAT IS NOT sexual !),and luckily this site exist.
If you know that there was this link,is beacuse you entered in this site,and you watched the video.
(like me)

If one day I will see a video of my daughter here,it will be beacause I will go to this site,and if in this hypothetical video my daughter will simply walk barefeet ,I certainly will have no problem about it ,i precise ONLY WALK BAREFEET,dressed normally and in a normal context for adolescent.

Cleared this points,I never will post photos or video of under 18,be sure.....