OK, I can resist a comment no longer. The latest model Anna, is fantastic. What's so attractive is that she's what you might call quirky-pretty and hence much more interesting and sexy than the conventional slender, lissom 'beauties' that you get elsewhere but who leave me cold.

The wonderful thing about Anna and those like her is that they make it so easy to imagine walking along with her, they're so real, so believable.

I soooooo hope that Anna actually DOES something in the coming installments and doesn't just wander aimlessly around occasionally posing; that would be such a waste. We've started well, going to the shop for a tube of toothpaste, a realistic, everyday and necessary thing to do. Now let's hope she goes into the metro, enters a busy fast food outlet and lights up a fag.

Please, Paul, let's have more shoots from Anna and those like her.

Mike123.

I do agree with you, Mike. I love tiny girls, especially curvy ones like Anna. And that's right that we"re fed up with all these conventional slender beauties.
Please more models like Daria (http://www.city-feet.com/models/228/view), Milana (http://www.city-feet.com/models/205/view), Olga (http://www.city-feet.com/models/196/view), Alexandra (http://www.city-feet.com/models/163/view) or the wonderful Julia (http://www.city-feet.com/models/132/view).

What do you mean by "we"? Just you and Mike123, I hope. Do not count me in.
My rating of your favourite models:
Daria (http://www.city-feet.com/models/228/view): UGLY
Milana (http://www.city-feet.com/models/205/view): ORDINARY
Olga (http://www.city-feet.com/models/196/view): CUTE
Alexandra (http://www.city-feet.com/models/163/view): UGLY
Julia (http://www.city-feet.com/models/132/view): DECENT

So you basically pay 40 dollars per month to fantasize on some clothed pictures and videos of a girl so unattractive that I would not shag her in real life even if it was HER to pay me 40 dollars on a DAILY basis to have sex, hahahaha!!!

Thanks, Sergei, I'd forgotten just how good the Milana shoot was, there's a bit of everything in there, shopping, public transport, fast food outlet and mercifully, no posing.

And Mr Nudescalze, since you put it like that, yes, that's exactly why I pay £35 a month.

Keep it up, Paul, please remember that there are people like me and Sergei - and many others - out here who are NOT looking for slinky waifs, convinced of their own irresistable beauty.

Lines, wrinkles, curves; bring 'em ON!

Mike123

.........and to me, Alexandra (Office Girl) is one of the top five models EVER in the history of CF.

What CAN you be thinking Mr Nudescalze?!

Mike123

Mike123: (...) "There are people like me and Sergei - and many others - out here who are NOT looking for slinky waifs, convinced of their own irresistable beauty" (...)
Sergeï: (...) "And that's right that we're fed up with all these conventional slender beauties" (...)
Mike123: (...) "The latest model Anna, is fantastic. What's so attractive is that she's what you might call quirky-pretty and hence much more interesting and sexy than the conventional slender, lissom 'beauties' that you get elsewhere but who leave me cold. The wonderful thing about Anna and those like her is that they make it so easy to imagine walking along with her, they're so real, so believable" (...)

SWAINS: "Hello guys! My name is SWAINS, and I am your WOOOORST NIGHTMAAAAARE!"
(and a BAREFOOT URBAN GIRLS exclusive, of course! )

Indeed. Toned, tanned, polished and posed, flawlessly beautiful.......and to me utterly lacking in any erotic charge.

Simply too much artifice. I fully realise there's a huge call for this kind of thing but for me imperfection and raw reality win out every time.

Who, outside our small community would think that there could be such graduations and niches hidden within?

Good luck to all of us and may all of us find something exciting somewhere.

Mike123.

Nudescalze is a rude troll, yet I have to concede that this time our tastes are rather in line. To me, Anna is just the last of a too long streak of disappointing debuts on City Feet. I have not joined the site since the last update featuring Alla http://www.city-feet.com/models/252/view, and none of the girls who debuted afterwards came close to convincing me to join the site again. The problem that I have with Anna, with all the newcomers to City Feet of the last two years, and with most of the girls mentioned by Sergeï, is not the body of the models (I equally appreciate slender and curvy girls): it is their faces that I find insignificant or, very often, absolutely unattractive. I have the same problem with most of the new debuts on Toes-In-Action of the last 4-5 years: leaving aside the scruffy outfits, ridiculous hairdos and too many piercings, I find that most of the girls are ordinary, or outright ugly. Barefoot Urban Girls has remained the only paysite about female barefooting where most models suit my tastes. Differently from Mike123, what the models do or do not do in the shootings does not make a big difference to me, provided that they walk barefoot and that there are no shoes in sight. It is the looks of the models that matters the most to me. I hope that The Feetosopher will maintain his very high standards as far as the beauty of the models who appear on his site is concerned.

Liar, cunt, hedgehog.... You are two of these things...Shouldn't take you more than a year or so to figure out which....

Besides, why are you even still here? Don't deny you'd give your right arm for a night with most of these women, as no woman in her right mind would bed your sorry ass.

On another note, seeing as I don't want this to be all about an oxygen-thieving troll, I don't get why some people just expect someone (least of all Swains) to be clapped out at 35.

I've seen gorgeous 40+ women even in the UK, and yet there are some 25 year olds who look like complete shit. All about lifestyle.

Following Barefootfootseeker's comments all I'd say is that I hope Mr Feetosopher continues to feed his niche, and a very clear niche it is and that Paul continues to cater for those of us like me and Sergei, even if not all the time.

The worst thing for everyone to pile into the same niche.

So I look forward to more imperfect, fuller figured / mature / quirky-pretty / curvaceous etc girls and women on CF: the best foot site on the web (for people like me, anyway)

Mike123

No doubt that I will continue to feed that "niche", as you call it, Mike123.. even though I think that shooting attractive models in cool outfits is not a "niche".. it's just an approach of mine to the female barefooting niche. You may like it or not, of course. Over the years, it has become pretty clear to me
who are the forum members who do not like this approach, for various reasons. In your case, I guess that posed shots and "interactive" videos
are the main reasons why you have NEVER commented positively a single update of mine. Or maybe it's just a problem that you have with me
personally, or with my models.. no clues why.. maybe because we are Italian? In any case, I can comfortably live with you and other dudes here systematically ignoring the very existence of BAREFOOT URBAN GIRLS.

I just draw your attention to some facts (not opinions or personal tastes).
SWAINS' perfection is a gift of her mom & pop. No "Photoshop beauties" at BAREFOOT URBAN GIRLS
Over the years, at BAREFOOT URBAN GIRLS I have also proposed in several occasions:
1) Over-40 barefoot beauties like CHARLOTTE: http://barefoot-urban-girls.com/free/pics/...20/demo0001.jpg
2) Curvy beauties like FENICE: http://barefoot-urban-girls.com/free/pics/...19/demo0001.jpg
3) Pregnant beauties like LAVINIA: http://barefoot-urban-girls.com/free/pics/...28/demo0003.jpg
Aren't those beauties "real" enough for your standards, Mike123?
Frankly speaking, I have seen none or very few of the above typologies of girls at both City Feet and Toes-In-Action over the last years ..
but to you, Duffman847, michael0218, Sergeï, dude, BicycleRepairman, alyfab, etc. (the list is pretty long), The Feetosopher is ALWAYS wrong..

That you have got very weird tastes, hahaha!

Mr. Shag-a-lot has spoken.. hahahahaha!!! You are the King of Losers here, Duffman847.. that is the only title you bear.. hahahahahah!!!

I thoroughly agree Mike123. I prefer vastly the "girl next door"...the tattooed little barefoot mall rat (Daria) an Alla, a YANA (oh, especially a Yana), any one of the multiple Ekaterinas throughout the years, the Sveta's, and one of the greatest "girls next door",...Milana (I love Milana)....to any of those tall, tanned, sneering lingerie/toothpaste models (both of them) that frankly leave me cold and disinterested. They're perfect however, for the likes of that blind idiot stumblebum...(you know who you are).who considers one of the lovely Alexandra's to be """ugly"""....which only shows that he has no business being on a site which is so rich in truly sexy, hot (and imperfect at times)girl next door barefoot lovelies.