Have you ever thought about this issue, guys? Well, I have and I can say that I find it quite irritating when one foot gets dirtier or cleaner than the other. I don´t know why but it always kind of distracts me when something like that happens.

Check out these girls:

1. Nastya
In the second episode she steps into a puddle and from that point on one of her feet is considerably cleaner.

http://www.city-feet.com/static/galleries/1016/sample1.jpg

http://www.city-feet.com/static/galleries/1016/sample0.jpg

http://www.city-feet.com/static/galleries/1019/sample0.jpg

These pictures give you a rough idea but it´s definitely better to watch the episode.

2. Sveta
In this case, the girl steps in some mud which sticks to her sole for a long time making it much dirtier than the other one. Again, quite irritating for me. And yes it occurs in the second episode as well.

http://www.city-feet.com/static/galleries/1251/sample3.jpg

http://www.city-feet.com/static/galleries/1251/sample2.jpg

http://www.city-feet.com/static/galleries/1254/sample3.jpg

What about you? What do you make of this aspect of going barefoot? Do you like it?

Well.. frankly speaking I don't care that much but.. I went for the "equally dirty" option.. mainly because I am fascinated by symmetry..

Wait a minute. Hold the front page. We actually AGREE on something!!!

Take the very underrated Valya for instance. Would this photo be the same with one clean sole?

same here, equally dirty, it always irritates me if they are very different dirty

Both feet equally dirty...one being dirtier than the other isn't a natural state of affairs, after all. For the model to maintain one being dirtier than the other would imply a state of artififice...which I though that many of you lads were opposed to.

Well.. I don't think that this will mark the beginning of a New Age in the relationships between us, Duffman847..
but yes, I do agree with you that the picture would not have been the same if one sole was cleaner than the other..

Not necessarily. She could have been pushed to step into a puddle in a crowded street for example. But I agree, the less artifice there is, the better.

Thank you all for your votes and comments! 8 - 0, quite a landslide so far.

One foot dirtier than the other for me....I realize I’m in the minority here.
That would indicate she was going “half barefoot” for a while.
With the incredible amount of FOOTage on the Internet, I still have yet to find a set of photos or website depicting a woman walking with only one shoe for a period of time before losing or ditching the other shoe. This is a micro fetish but I would bet there are enough guys out there like me who would support such a site. (Then again I am not the typical foot dude—I can’t stand pedicured/painted toes, foot/toe jewelry, feet in porn scenarios, tattooed...I like them natural. Which makes my situation even more frustrating...)

Thanks for your comment, tubMan. I´m not that different from you. Although I actually like painted toes, I hate 99% of the foot stuff that is available on the internet as well. If it weren´t especially for city-feet, I wouldn´t even need my broadband. I like it when girls are barefoot in normal everyday situations. That´s why I love it when they go shopping, for instance.

Speaking of frustration, these days I´m suffering from it as well. Why? Because of Paul´s newest Julia. Would she do her "dancing" if she had her shoes on? Of course not. Her first video is only about posing and showing the camera that she´s barefoot. That´s why I´m going to skip the rest of her adventure. She´s a likable girl with pretty feet and for me sexy outfit and yet watching her performance is like watching beautiful girls play, say, basketball...

As for a girl wearing one shoe only, I believe that it could be done. Why don´t we ask Paul to try this scenario: A girl sporting formal clothes and heels has left her office and is in a hurry to meet her friend. She realises that her shoe rubs, she takes it off and walks for several hundreds of metres to the nearest pharmacy to get a piece of sticking plaster. She then realises that her foot is too dirty and because she doesn´t want to ruin her new shoe, she takes off the other one as well, puts the whole pair into her bag (this is critical, otherwise the whole series would be lost - I hate it when girls carry their shoes. It´s like watching basketball again ) and walks barefoot. Then she meets her friend and they go shopping together, travel to their favourite restaurant by metro, and so on.

I hear you. The internet is full of every fetish (many disgusting - diaper fetishes? Girls flatulent fetishes?) but is null when it comes to more wholesome (PG-13 rated) feet sites besides CF and UF.
In the past I’ve found sites like C4InteractiveMedia (YouTube channel) that are never updated and are big teases. Sure they are YouTube sites therefore free, but what’s the point if they are never updated?

I like your idea re: escapade for a one shoed/eventually barefoot girl. C4Interactive had that idea yet the girls wear nylons and the clips are too short.
And they never take off the other shoe.
A giant missed opportunity if you ask me.

I have not looked at the clips or photos of Julie yet although she doesn’t appear to be wearing polish so that’s a plus for me.

I agree - a missed opportunity indeed. I know that channel because you or somebody else talked about it here a few months/ years ago. The videos are too short, which is a pitty really...

Hope you like Julia better than I do. As I said, the girl is perfect. Only the scenario wasn´t what I´d expected.

one shoed? So... one foot clean , the other dirty? ok: hobby barfuss sarah in winter

@tubMan, @bfwatcher: you should never forget that most of the Ordinary Joes & Plain Janes out there..
find barefooting and dirty feet exactly as DISGUSTING as farts, diapers etc.

P.S. In the last 12 years I have read several posts by dudes with ultra-peculiar barefooting-related tastes that said
"I would bet there are enough guys out there like me who would support such a site".. well not so sure about that, gentlemen.. sorry.
At BAREFOOT URBAN GIRLS I try to deliver a wide spectrum of barefooting-related material.. and I barely break even.
Let's face it, guys.. very few of you are still willing to spend some bucks to enjoy non-nude (and even nude!) barefooting-related content.
There is too much of everything for free on internet nowadays.
I doubt that there are many footographers/webmasters around who are insane enough to launch a paysite entirely dedicated to
"women walking with only one shoe for a period of time before losing or ditching the other shoe"..
oh, and of course NO "pedicured/painted toes, foot/toe jewelry, feet in porn scenarios, tattooed feet"..

Cool! Thanks for your comment and the picture!

Come on, Feetosopher. You´re not being fair. Nobody held that C4 Interactive media guy at gunpoint. It was his own idea to launch the channel, wasn´t it? Perhaps he was just testing the market. If there is demand for all sorts of limping girls with or without crutches, he might have thought that a girl who loses one shoe could be interesting as well. What´s wrong with that?

Yes, money is always an issue and yet you aren´t fair here either. I´ve been with Paul and City Feet for eight years and have never cancelled my membership. In other words, I´ve helped him to pay for quite a few models already. That´s why I believe I have every right to express my opinion regarding the site´s content. And again, do you really think that the brief plot I outlined above is that far-fetched? Well, I´m convinced that it is perfectly along the lines of CF poetics.