Do you guys think that you could be attracted to an armless woman?
The advantage of this is that she would use her feet in ways most of us use our hands, and I find that very arousing. And yes, I could very definitely be attracted to her.

Come on, this is just weird. Next.

Remember,...she does EVERYTHING with her feet.....so I'll pass.

Yeah, it's a weird question, but I'll give an answer.

If I were otherwise attracted to her (looks and personality), her lack of arms would not be a deal breaker. Besides, you know she'd be showing her bare feet almost constantly, and her toes would be extremely dexterous and flexible and very capable of using them to "do things" for her man, if you catch my drift.

My point exactly!

A big part of the turn-on for me is the voluntary nature of bare feet. I'm not into the idea that someone has no choice but to be barefoot (whether because of extreme poverty, or a disability).

I think that's part of my attraction to hippie girls. Hippies come from wealthy countries where everyone can afford shoes. They're making a statement, "yeah, I don't want to wear shoes, even in these streets where my feet turn black". That's the part I like.

So no, I wouldn't find the barefoot part of an armless woman to be attractive.

I understand what you mean about the voluntary part, but the way I see it, an armless girl who uses her feet for hands is overcoming her disability. It's a real accomplishment, and not something to be pitied. I mean, yes, it's a tough break to not have arms, but she's making the best of a bad situation. Sure, her going barefoot may not be strictly voluntary, but I would guess that she appreciates being able to use her feet and toes rather than having them covered up by shoes and socks all the time. The good outweighs the bad.

Anyway, not saying anyone has to agree with me, just offering my take on the situation.