Big CF and TIN fan here, thought I'd share for those curious about signing up with bocukom.

I finally did and this is basically what I learned. When you sign up, this is around $40... there's no login or anything. You get a few updates, for that month, sent to you through Google Drive. You don't get to choose what you see. I asked them several times, hey, where's the rest. Where's the access to the content. They answer, but none of these answers are really answers.

These items are photo sets and some videos. You know those pics you see, video stills, previews and you think, hmm, maybe good stuff in here. That's as good as it gets people. Because 98% of what you see, is essentially junk. Literally 100 photos of a girl in almost the exact same position. It's maddening to go through it. One theme will have 10, 20 or more sets... the same theme... we're talking hundreds of images of basically duplicates of already-lousy shots.

The best video, is City Feet's worst video. Oh and let me remind, you still can't choose! When you cancel, they punish you by sending you email that you will no longer get their 'bonuses'. Sound good everyone??!

Oh, it sounds like a real winner, lol.....a pale facsimile of a third rate, wannabe poor man's version of City Feet, it sounds to me. I'll stick with the Gold Standard(!) here at CF....thanks for the head's up drtyftfrk!

Thanks for the details! I have often visited this site as they are always showing updates around the net but I am immediately put off by the price every time. I was also curious about what you get for your money because when you look at a video it says something on the lines of "Buy this for only ...", which always suggested that you only get the one video for the rediculous price stated - Seems my suspicians may have been right to a certain extent.

Thing is though, everything you mention in your post is forgivable in comparison to the fact that this website, which is clearly aimed at a foot fetish audience has a page called "School Collection", which actually does feature children showing off their bare feet. It's completely inappropriate and wrong - I really hope that this site gets closed down for these actions.

Yep that's another thing... there are girls in there who are probably 13, 12, even about 10. Not posing sexually or anything... but it's like, a clear bent for child behavior. One series is like 10, 11 year old girls 'having a party' or something.

So with the of-age girls, their 'behavior' is still very childlike. But not even in a hot way, like a grown woman clearly role playing, where she knows she's role playing. Just childlike or 'innocent' behavior, which comes through as very irritating.

Sounds a little like that site that devoted it's self to children's feet..Tyflas...sick stuff.

Yes, totally agree, I joined last month and have been shocked and embarrassed to receive shoots featuring under 18s. I've asked to be excluded from these updates until my subscription ends.
Also agree that the shoots are poorly photographed with frankly bizarre content.
Avoid until it improves or changes its orientation completely.
Weird.
Mike123

Oh Mike, I'm convinced that, besides the quality content issue, that there's something Tyflas-like about that site...and that they're contributing, knowingly or not, to the perception some people have that "feet lovers" are perverted. Thanks for the warning though...I hope everyone heeds it.

I've often been curious about bocukom, but was always worried about the vagueness of the details about it (some of that is probably due to language differences).

Thank you, drtyftfrk, for taking the hit for us and sharing the details.

I bought one clip, jenya barefoot across moscow I think it was.

It's a shame because the site looks like it has some good stuff...but any under 18 stuff is a big no no.

ab505

cd901

Won't be long before they go under, I'll bet.

I sent the administrator of this site a note saying that he's getting a bad press for publishing under 18 shoots and got this response:

"Hello! We are very sorry, but we do not agree with this opinion.
We do not do business, we are engaged in creative work.

We did not send you the materials of our participants younger than 18 years after your request.

Evie (Dirty Flexi Feet) - 19 years.

We do not understand why children and teenagers should not walk barefoot. We do not express sexual content in context.
We are engaged in the promotion of healthy lifestyles. We help people to overcome prejudices.

Thank you for understanding."

fair play to him for responding and in fact his last couple of updates have been pretty good - two girls barefoot in the city on a wet evening - both well over 18 - and a girl - again over 18 - in what looks like a grimy disused factory. Nice.

Check them out.

Mike123

Yet they charge in excess of $30.00 per update!!!

While it's true that the site doesn't express sexual content, in my opinion neither does City Feet, Toes In Action, Barefoot Urban Girls and those sites of the past like Postmodern Women etc, etc!!! The fact that there is a charge for the material they produce immediately suggests "Premium or Adult" content, in my opinion anyway. I wonder if they did a survey amongst existing members/buyers, how many actually have a foot fetish - I'd bet the number is quite high. The fact that this topic was started on City Feet Forum means that we, meaning bare foot / dirty feet lovers are aware of the site and what sort of audience it can & will attract.

I personally have nothing against the websites updates that feature adults - In fact I agree with @Mike123 about the last couple of updates - I've seen them previewed on Youtube and they have really caught my eye.

I guess that as a guy who is interested in promoting the barefoot lifestyle myself, I see nothing wrong with promoting the idea of children going barefoot! But, unfortunately in this day and age, whenever I see photo's of a young girl with her feet exposed, I know that it's going to get a lot of attention from the wrong sort of people, and giving it to them on a plate like this is just asking for trouble.

Bottom line is, the site just isn't clear about it's objectives and the childrens section makes us all very uncomfortable. Get rid of the "School" section, lower the rates, and let all of us enjoy the site!

A few final thoughts:

How do you feel the girl is portrayed in This Clip?

If this really is about promoting the barefoot lifestyle - Where are the Male models???

Sites that promote the "barefoot lifestyle", with all those graying, hippieish men do absolutely nothing for me, unless that is, a featured barefooter is an attractive young lady, 18 at least, being shown walking around in public places. When this is the content of one of those sites, then it aspires to be like City Feet, TIA and Barefoot Urban Girls, sites that do not showcase EXPLICIT sexuality, but rather implies it. As we here well know, there is nothing as sexy as a barefoot girl in public, so in that case, I WILL be interested.
There was, and maybe still is, a site named Tyflas, which devoted it's entire content to girl children basically, going barefoot. This was very creepy. What they did (and still do maybe) was tout the precociousness of these little girls with what I believe was the intent to attract perverts and paedos. So good riddance to Tyflas, as it indeed perpetuate the misconception of foot lovers as sickos.
Ewan, that clip seems to fashion that girl as another precocious type, and I see no good in it at all.....again, the word "creepy"comes to mind.

I actually received the disused factory film this morning (my cancelled membership has a few days to run) and it actually features a girl stripping - not what I expected - but also puts a lie to the idea that the site is not meant to be sexualised.
Bonkers.
The site is a real mix of good stuff, though often appallingly badly filmed, and other weird creepy stuff which makes you feel embarrassed to have joined up.
Payment is too high and the updates come when he feels like it.
Again, bonkers.
We'll watch its progress with both caution and interest.
Mike123