Wait a minute. Hold the front page. We actually AGREE on something!!!

Take the very underrated Valya for instance. Would this photo be the same with one clean sole?

Come on, Feetosopher. You´re not being fair. Nobody held that C4 Interactive media guy at gunpoint. It was his own idea to launch the channel, wasn´t it? Perhaps he was just testing the market. If there is demand for all sorts of limping girls with or without crutches, he might have thought that a girl who loses one shoe could be interesting as well. What´s wrong with that?

Yes, money is always an issue and yet you aren´t fair here either. I´ve been with Paul and City Feet for eight years and have never cancelled my membership. In other words, I´ve helped him to pay for quite a few models already. That´s why I believe I have every right to express my opinion regarding the site´s content. And again, do you really think that the brief plot I outlined above is that far-fetched? Well, I´m convinced that it is perfectly along the lines of CF poetics.

Well, if you read my comment again, you will see that I did not object at all to your right of expressing your desires about CF content (or the content of any other site). Consumers rule the market, not vendors.
I just said that the more peculiar are the desires, the less likely it is that you will find a dude who is willing to build a site ENTIRELY devoted to the kind of stuff you desire. Nothing more, and nothing else than that..
But of course you might be lucky enough to find the right dude with the right stuff.. time will tell..
As for my considerations about fewer and fewer dudes willing to spend money on barefooting-related paysites.. they were general ones, surely not targeted at you. But they are based on sad facts, and even sadder figures. The average combined number of subscribers to http://barefoot-urban-girls.com/ and http://barefoot-nudity.com/ in 2019 is around 50% of what it used to be in 2014-2015.
I have managed to keep both sites online without sacrificing quality through a series of adjustments.. but it's getting tougher and tougher.

I cannot but re-state what I wrote to @tubMan.. if you took offence for anything that I wrote, please accept my apologies, @bfwatcher.

Most of my sarcastic rants in this forum are aimed at nobody in particular, and are only a way to digest my frustration about the recent "evolution"
of "barefoot-themed entertainment" on internet, as well as about the fact that despite I rip my ass off to deliver quality stuff at both http://barefoot-urban-girls.com/ and http://barefoot-nudity.com/,
I am getting declining commercial success and appreciation in return.
Probably I must come to terms with the (very sad, to me at least) fact that the types of barefoot beauty I celebrate on my sites have become unfashionable.

As long as I am not losing too much money on my sites.. I'll keep them online. And then probably I will quit. Nothing tragic, after all.
Kingdoms rise, kingdoms fall.

Thanks Feetosopher, but there´s no need to apologize. We´re discussing stuff, that´s all.

Believe me or not but I see why you´re frustrated. You work hard and a tangible result in terms of your revenue is nowhere to be seen. Perhaps people don´t have enough money anymore. It can´t be about the quality you offer. What´s available for free is nothing in comparison with what you, Hal or Paul produce. You say that kingdoms rise and kingdoms fall, true, but without you guys around, life wouldn´t be the same. Yes, we argue about what a perfect content should look like, but at the end of the day, you three deliver exactly the stuff we only dreamt about before the Internet made all this possible...

great to know that you did not take offence from my words, @bfwatcher!

And thank you so much for your words.. they have made my day!
As you know, I run BUG and BN as a self-funded, serious hobby.. so the appreciation of connoisseurs plays an important role
in helping me to hold on in spite of disappointing business results, and of all the nuisance that running adult sites implies!